Energy Literacy Advocates Newsroom
Energy Literacy Advocates (ELA) is a non-partisan, non-profit, public education and advocacy group dedicated to improving the energy literacy of all sectors of our democracy in order to empower a comprehensive national energy policy that is responsible and sustainable. Stay tuned for updated energy news!
Friday, October 2, 2009
Senators Reveal More Plans for Climate Legislation

Labels: climate change, economy, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 12:22 PM
0 comments
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Boxer, Kerry Launch Campaign for Climate Legislation
To listen to early analysis of this bill, visit the links below:
Bloomberg
Fox Business
Labels: climate change, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 2:12 PM
0 comments
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Walk-outs Show U.S. Split on Climate Change
This is a refreshing development in this author's view, as any truly meaningful policy discussions need to equally weight all affected party's views. While eventually consensus among all parties needs to be sought, breaking the hold that special interest groups often enjoy when influencing legislation should help more voices, and therefore options, be heard.
Read the article...
Labels: climate change, energy policy
posted by Jamie Lang at 12:00 PM
0 comments
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Carbon Emission Reduction Methods Debated
A new study conducted by the University of Texas at Austin, and issued as supplemental research by the National Academy of Sciences, reveals that by decreasing the weight of vehicles nationwide, much greater gains can be made in decreasing carbon emissions. If all US vehicles were decreased in weight by 0.1 percent, this would make a 10 times greater reduction in carbon emissions than an 0.1 percent change in housing density.
To read the study, which outlines options for emissions control of greenhouse gases, click here.
Labels: climate change, efficiency, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 12:11 PM
0 comments
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
As Congress Returns, Energy Policy Debate Heats Up
Looming largest is the Senate decision on the House bill capping emissions, passed before recess began. Various utility groups, which support the decision, are planning to begin lobbying corporate America this week, by demonstrating the necessity of promoting clean energy.
Follow the energy policy discussion in D.C. here with Energy Literacy Advocates.
For more on this story, click here.
Labels: climate change, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 12:03 PM
0 comments
Friday, August 28, 2009
Obama Administration Finds Support on Energy Issues
52 percent of those polled support Obama's controversial cap and trade system to limit greenhouse gas emissions. 42 percent opposed the idea.
Overall, the results indicate fairly broad and steady public support for the Obama administration's agenda toward revamping US energy policy.
For the full article in the Washington Post, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy, energy policy, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 11:35 AM
0 comments
Monday, August 24, 2009
International Energy News: Power Europe via the Sahara?
The technology behind Desertec involves collecting energy from solar rays gathered in the Sahara desert and transmitting it via undersea cables to Europe. Supporters are promoting the project's non-carbon footprint and economic benefits for Northern Africa.
The project does face some opposition. Detractors are wary of investment in new technology in an unstable political region, and doubtful that intercontinental transmission of solar energy is more effective and efficient than local photovoltaic production.
To read more, click here.
Labels: climate change, electricity, energy sources, global warming, renewables
posted by Amanda Voss at 4:41 PM
0 comments
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Energy News from Around the World: Australia OKs Renewable Target

Labels: climate change, electricity, renewables
posted by Amanda Voss at 1:40 PM
0 comments
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Review from the National Clean Energy Summit
Promoting the Obama administration's energy policy, Energy Secretary Steven Chu emphasized the need for a carbon tax to support many of these policy goals.
Other policy discussions included mandating a renewable energy portfolio for the US electricity supply and modernizing the electricity supply grid.
While the agenda during the second National Clean Energy Summit focused largely on policy supports for the green energy industry, it featured former vice president Al Gore's case for quick action.
Gore warned that the planet's petroleum reservers are falling faster than predicted, which can only lead to more price spikes and shortages.
For a more in-depth review of the Summit, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy policy, gas tax, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 1:48 PM
0 comments
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Addressing Greenhouse Gas from Electricity Will Need Broad Effort
The report paid special attention to the pocketbooks of consumers, and found that a "full technology portfolio" is needed to avoid penalizing the average household. EPRI endorsed building 45 new nuclear reactors, increasing energy efficiency and employing carbon capture technology to help reach greenhouse gas goals.
Still, the report warns that to meet environmental goals, energy prices will have to rise, impacting households at up to $400 additional per year over the next thirty years.
To read more, click here.
Labels: climate change, efficiency, electricity, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 11:40 AM
0 comments
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Energy Secretary Urges China to Cooperate in Climate Efforts

Labels: climate change, efficiency, energy, global warming
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:15 AM
0 comments
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Climate Change Hearings Take Center Stage for Democrats

Labels: climate change, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:20 AM
0 comments
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Obama Looking Forward to Senate Action on Energy Bill

Labels: climate change, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 9:13 AM
0 comments
Friday, June 26, 2009
American Clean Energy and Security Act Gets Boost from President

Labels: climate change, environment, global warming, renewables, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:30 AM
0 comments
Wednesday, June 24, 2009
Consensus Nearing on Climate Legislation
“It is quite possible and maybe even probable we will go” to the floor with the measure at the end of this week “and complete the energy legislation,” Steny Hoyer, House Majority Leader and Maryland Democrat, told reporters in Washington today.
The American Clean Energy and Security Act would establish a market system for trading U.S. pollution permits as a way to control greenhouse gases that contribute to climate change.
To read more, click here.
Labels: climate change, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 7:56 PM
0 comments
Monday, June 22, 2009
Budget Office Releases Controversial Energy Bill Costs

The CBO calculated average cost to be $175 per household per year. To calculate these expenses, CBO evaluated only the cap and trade legislation portions. Costs will be higher for wealthier households, based on a net cost of $22 billion.
Critics have cited the CBO's estimates as overly optimistic. The costs calculate expenses for only part of the bill, and count benefits like free permits to offset costs. Without these provisions, total cost may reach beyond $110 billion in 2020, or $890 annually per household.
HR 2454 is expected to be put up for full debate in the House by July.
To read more about this issue in The New York Times, click here.
Labels: climate change, environment, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 1:32 PM
0 comments
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Energy Secretary Pushes Climate Bill

Labels: climate change, environment, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 9:50 AM
0 comments
Wednesday, June 17, 2009
Senate Energy Panel Approves Energy Bill

Labels: climate change, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 11:39 AM
0 comments
Tuesday, June 2, 2009
US Climate Chief Pledges Emission Cuts, Help for Poor
To aid developing countries, Stern said clauses on emissions trading in the Waxman-Markey Bill being debated by the US Congress would provide $15-$20bn a year in allowances annually to poor nations, based on a carbon price of $15-$20 a tonne.
To read the full interview, click here.
Labels: climate change, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 9:32 AM
0 comments
Monday, June 1, 2009
Debate Resumes Over Waxman-Markey Climate Bill
To offer a counterpoint to the debate, we are posting a link to a Washington Post article, which discusses some of the possible negative points of the Waxman-Markey bill.
To access the article, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy, energy policy, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 9:09 AM
0 comments
Thursday, May 21, 2009
2008 Data Reveals Record Drop in U.S. Carbon Emissions
Much of this decrease may be attributed to the drop in travel caused by soaring gasoline and diesel costs last summer and the general economic decline later in the year, which added up to a 2.2 percent drop in energy consumption. The largest previous drop in travel related emissions was 1.3 percent in 1991.
Overall, the government reported Wednesday that energy-related carbon dioxide emissions declined by 2.8 percent last year compared to 2007, the largest annual drop since the government began regular reporting of greenhouse gas pollution.
To read more, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy, environment, global warming
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:26 AM
0 comments
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
Amendments, Debate Open Today on Energy Act
Major Republican proposals look to include hydropower and other alternative energy sources in the bill, as well as mitigate forecast negative economic effects of some of the measures - specifically cap and trade proposals.
To read a critique of the proposed legislation, click here.
Labels: climate change, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 10:02 AM
0 comments
Monday, May 18, 2009
Energy Committee Opens Debate Today
Sponsored by committee chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Energy and Environment Subcommittee chairman Edward Markey (D-MA), the bill offers some sweeping changes in U.S. energy policy, including limits on carbon emissions and a government-run permitting system.
Committee Republicans are expected to offer an alternative measure and amendments during today's hearings.
To read more, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy policy, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:27 AM
0 comments
Friday, May 15, 2009
American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 Takes Another Step
“We will have the votes for passage of this bill next week,” predicted Henry Waxman, Chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
Several compromises have helped the bill reach this point. Revisions in the bill call for a 17 percent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from 2005 levels by 2020 - down from the original 20 percent reduction, but still higher than Obama’s initial target of some 15 percent.
Renewable energy targets have dropped from 17.5 percent by 2020 to 15 percent. The 15 percent target will be combined with a requirement to boost energy efficiency by 5 percent, for a total of 20 percent.
For more coverage on this bill, click here.
Labels: climate change, renewables, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:47 AM
0 comments
Monday, April 27, 2009
New Policy Ushering in Renaissance for Nuclear Energy?
Cap and trade could be a big win for nuclear power. The nation's 104 operating nuclear plants produce already 20 percent of its electricity, making them, by far, the largest source of electricity that does not result in greenhouse gas emissions. If a cap and a price are imposed on carbon dioxide emissions, these plants could be among the biggest winners in the vast economic shifts that would be created by greenhouse gas regulations.
While U.S. energy companies have already filed 17 applications with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for 26 new reactor operating licenses, demonstrating growing buzz around nuclear power, the future of the industry still hangs on the uncertain support of the Obama administration.
To read the full article, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy sources, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 7:43 AM
0 comments
Friday, April 24, 2009
Weighing the Cost of Proposed Energy Legislation
These higher prices would come as the result of proposed cap and trade legislation, currently under consideration in Congress. The proposed plan puts a price on the gases linked to global warming, and establishes a paid permit system for emissions.
While energy providers proposed that initial permits be offered free of charge, the president's budget assumes that allowances will be sold and uses the projected $650 billion in revenue to help people pay for higher energy costs and to develop new, more climate friendly energy sources.
"It should not be legislation that is designed to raise revenue. ... It should be something that is trying to achieve its objective of reducing carbon emissions in the country and that alone," said Glenn English, CEO of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, which represents 42 million consumers in 47 states.
To read the full article, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy, environment, gas tax, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:48 AM
0 comments
Thursday, April 9, 2009
Administration Adviser Elaborates on Climate Change Policy
Current cap-and-trade legislation is under consideration in the House, with a goal voting date falling before Memorial Day.
While Obama lobbied heavily for auctioning off all emissions permits issued at the outset of a cap-and-trade system, the compromised economic situation has brought a re-evaluation of that strategy. Many industry leaders say that having to pay for all the allowances at first would drive up energy costs too quickly.
To read the full article in the Washington Post, click here.
Labels: climate change, economy, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:58 AM
0 comments
Monday, April 6, 2009
Two Viewpoints on the 2009 Energy Bill
To offer further insight into this bill, and to allow for a study of contrasting opinions surrounding this legislation, we are linking to two articles - one supporting, one against - the ACES draft.
Arguing against this proposal is an article from Nicolas Loris, Research Assistant and Ben Lieberman, Senior Policy Analyst in Energy and the Environment in the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at The Heritage Foundation. They contend that "The architects of ACES argue that the bill will create millions of clean energy jobs and help Americans save on energy costs, but in reality it will do just the opposite. Using taxpayer dollars to invest in inefficient energy sources while artificially driving up the costs of reliable energy with a cap-and-trade program will only cause more economic pain for the consumer—with no environmental benefit to show for it." To read the full article, click here.
In support of the ACES bill is an article from David Doniger of the National Resources Defense Council (NRDC), published in the Huffington Post. He states that "The draft combines standards and incentives for rapidly deploying clean energy and energy efficiency technologies with firm economy-wide limits on the carbon pollution that is driving global warming." To read the full article, click here.
Labels: climate change, economy, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:09 AM
0 comments
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Climate Lobbyists, Climate Bills Escalate in D.C.
According to the New York Times, since January politicians have introduced more than 20 bills mentioning climate change, including proposals that would prohibit taxes on the emissions of domestic animals and would require metropolitan planning organizations to incorporate climate in their transportation blueprints. In the 109th Congress, by comparison, members of Congress introduced only 60 or so bills on the topic over a two-year period from 2005 to 2006.
The surge in climate-related lobbying is also revealing how broad reaching many energy reforms can be, as diverse industries, interest groups and municipalities come to the bargaining table.
To read the full New York Times report, click here.
Labels: climate change, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 8:00 AM
0 comments
Friday, March 6, 2009
Reid Indicates Support for New Multi-Issue Energy Bill Strategy
Reid had previously outlined a three bill strategy for enacting President Obama's energy policies, but his combination of energy standards with the controversial cap-and-trade program into one bill has now drawn both criticism and praise. While some organizations lauded his efforts at attempting to quickly enact energy policy change, others are concerned that the cap-and-trade program's inclusion in the bill will endanger the passage of other, less controversial, energy measures.
The bill now faces an uncertain future in the Senate, where it will need 60 votes.
To read the full article in the New York Times, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 9:39 AM
0 comments
Friday, February 27, 2009
A Look Into Energy Measures in Proposed Federal Budget
Funding increases include more money to NASA for space-based monitoring of greenhouse gases, expanded support at the Energy Department for finding ways to economically capture carbon emissions from coal-burning power plants, and more money for the Interior Department to mitigate the impact of climate change on public lands and wildlife
To help with funding, the budge proposes imposing a new excise tax and fees on companies that take oil and natural gas from federal waters and reimposes a tax — again largely targeting the oil industry — to pay for cleaning up Superfund sites.
To be noted, however, $15 billion of the funding stream necessary for Obama's initiatives relies on carbon pollution permits, which have yet to be proposed by Congress.
To read the full article, click here.
Labels: climate change, gas tax, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 9:14 AM
0 comments
Friday, February 20, 2009
Framing the Peak Energy Debate
"Will we continue to use fossil fuels to the detriment of our planet and the human population? Or can we clean up our act in time to avoid calamitous change? That's the dilemma the world currently faces, yet in spite of efforts to transition to alterative energy sources, projections show that annual fossil fuel demand is likely to increase 45 per cent by 2030."
While focusing on the relationship between fossil fuel consumption and the climate, Kleiner also highlights the lack of information in the public domain, leading - in some experts' opionions - to the deepening of the energy crisis.
To read the full article, click here.
Labels: climate change, energy, global warming, renewables
posted by Amanda Voss at 12:54 PM
0 comments
Wednesday, November 19, 2008
UK Hosts First-Ever Carbon Dioxide Auction
While European Union member nations are required to participate in emissions trading, other nations are eyeing the allowance system. Japan and Australia have announced plans for experimental carbon emission trading, and President-elect Barack Obama has promised to introduce a similar cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions in the US.
Labels: climate change, economy, energy policy, u.s. energy policy
posted by Amanda Voss at 12:16 PM
0 comments
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
Americans More Concerned About Global Warming
http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/10/20/warming.poll/index.html
Poll shows Americans getting more concerned about global warming
Survey finds more Americans believe phenomenon proven. Majority say U.S. should take action even if other nations don't. Most Americans believe emissions from cars, industries the primary cause.
(CNN) -- Most Americans blame emissions from cars and industrial plants as the primary cause of global warming and believe the United States should reduce levels even if other countries don't, a survey shows.
Fifty-six percent of poll respondents said the phenomenon of global warming has been proven, and can be largely blamed on human endeavors, such as power plants and factories, according to the CNN/Opinion Research Corp. poll.
In comparison, 21 percent of those surveyed claimed global warming problems are caused either by natural changes or are unproven.
Sixty-six percent of Americans believe the United States should do what it can to reduce global warming, even if other nations ignore it. This compares with 52 percent of respondents who believed that way in 2001.
In that year, 34 percent thought the United States needed to reduce harmful gases only if other nations did. A much smaller proportion, 16 percent, responded that way in 2007.
The survey of 1,212 adults was conducted October 12-14 and has a sampling error of plus or minus 4.5 percentage points.
Labels: climate change, energy, energy policy, global warming, u.s. energy policy
posted by Jamie Lang at 6:10 AM
0 comments

