Energy Literacy Advocates (ELA) is a non-partisan, non-profit, public education organization working to improve the energy literacy of all sectors of our democracy.

Energy Literacy Advocates Newsroom

Energy Literacy Advocates (ELA) is a non-partisan, non-profit, public education and advocacy group dedicated to improving the energy literacy of all sectors of our democracy in order to empower a comprehensive national energy policy that is responsible and sustainable. Stay tuned for updated energy news!


Wednesday, August 12, 2009

Review from the National Clean Energy Summit

The National Clean Energy Summit, held in Las Vegas this year, focused on bolstering "green" energy jobs and policy. Suggestions from the various panels could shape federal policy, including placing an emphasis on building weatherization, funding for alternative energy power plants and carbon regulation.

Promoting the Obama administration's energy policy, Energy Secretary Steven Chu emphasized the need for a carbon tax to support many of these policy goals.

Other policy discussions included mandating a renewable energy portfolio for the US electricity supply and modernizing the electricity supply grid.

While the agenda during the second National Clean Energy Summit focused largely on policy supports for the green energy industry, it featured former vice president Al Gore's case for quick action.

Gore warned that the planet's petroleum reservers are falling faster than predicted, which can only lead to more price spikes and shortages.

For a more in-depth review of the Summit, click here.

Labels: , , , ,

posted by Amanda Voss at 1:48 PM 0 comments


Friday, April 24, 2009

Weighing the Cost of Proposed Energy Legislation

The Associated Press - Electricity providers warned Thursday that consumers will face higher electricity prices if Congress passes a global warming bill without giving utilities some allowances to emit greenhouse gases.

These higher prices would come as the result of proposed cap and trade legislation, currently under consideration in Congress. The proposed plan puts a price on the gases linked to global warming, and establishes a paid permit system for emissions.

While energy providers proposed that initial permits be offered free of charge, the president's budget assumes that allowances will be sold and uses the projected $650 billion in revenue to help people pay for higher energy costs and to develop new, more climate friendly energy sources.

"It should not be legislation that is designed to raise revenue. ... It should be something that is trying to achieve its objective of reducing carbon emissions in the country and that alone," said Glenn English, CEO of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, which represents 42 million consumers in 47 states.

To read the full article, click here.

Labels: , , , , ,

posted by Amanda Voss at 8:48 AM 0 comments


Friday, February 27, 2009

A Look Into Energy Measures in Proposed Federal Budget

The Associated Press - President Barack Obama's proposed budget revealed the administration's initial approaches to energy policy.

Funding increases include more money to NASA for space-based monitoring of greenhouse gases, expanded support at the Energy Department for finding ways to economically capture carbon emissions from coal-burning power plants, and more money for the Interior Department to mitigate the impact of climate change on public lands and wildlife

To help with funding, the budge proposes imposing a new excise tax and fees on companies that take oil and natural gas from federal waters and reimposes a tax — again largely targeting the oil industry — to pay for cleaning up Superfund sites.

To be noted, however, $15 billion of the funding stream necessary for Obama's initiatives relies on carbon pollution permits, which have yet to be proposed by Congress.

To read the full article, click here.

Labels: , , ,

posted by Amanda Voss at 9:14 AM 0 comments


Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Making the Case for a Gas Tax: Robert Rapier's "Taxes And Choice"

The utilization of a gas tax in the U.S. energy policy toolkit is an immediately controversial topic, due to the historical attitude that all tax increases must be bad. In a commentary issued December 15, Robert Rapier, Engineering Director for Accsys Technologies, makes a compelling and unique case FOR a gas tax.

Rapier argues that not only does the U.S. needs a gas tax, it should change its perception towards this tool. Comparing the gas tax to the tax on alcohol and cigarettes, Rapier makes the case that a gas tax does not represent a tax hike, but merely a check on consumption. Not only does this promote conservation, it lends funding to long-term transportation solutions and habits.

To access Rapier's full article, issued by ASPO-USA, click here.

Labels: ,

posted by Amanda Voss at 2:30 PM 0 comments


Wednesday, May 23, 2007

What about Gas Taxes?

Certainly there are pros and cons to any approach we take as we try to avoid an economically painful energy future, but most mainstream economists agree that one efficient option would be to raise gasoline taxes in the U.S. in order to decrease demand. A recent article on this topic explores the option of a gasoline tax further (read it here). This policy option alone will not solve our energy issues, but should be seriously considered along with many other conservation, efficiency, and supply mitigation measures.

Labels: ,

posted by Jamie Lang at 2:17 PM 0 comments

Copyright 2007- 2009 © Energy Literacy Advocates - All rights reserved.